>> A few update suggestions were taken into account >> from static source code analysis. >> >> Markus Elfring (2): >> Return directly after a failed kzalloc() >> Remove two OOM messages >> >> drivers/input/serio/at32psif.c | 10 +++------- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > What possible rationale is there for including this "references" header? > 566abcd9.1060...@users.sourceforge.net
Do any more software developers dare to reconsider source code also around a jump label like "out"? > This message id is for your message: > "Source code review around jump label usage" > sent December 11, 2015! Can such an association with a bit of background information be occasionally useful for clarification of corresponding implementation details? Regards, Markus
