On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 16:11 +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 20:54 -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote: > > Rusty Russell wrote: > > > Indeed, I'm expecting to push lguest this week, and this code will > > > effect me, so I'd like to see this in a -mm soon... > > > > Yes, I took a look at the lguest changes today and I think these won't > > generate conflicts, just make stuff easier for you ;) Course you've now > > got a couple new paravirt-ops to support, but the native ones are fine > > for temporary use. > > Implementing stolen time is something I'd like to do, since it'd be a > nice self-contained example the expectations.
hmm stolen time could even be useful without virtualization; to a large degree, if cpufreq reduces the speed of your cpu you have "stolen cycles" that way... I wonder if this concept can be used for that as well... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
