Hi.
2016-07-06 0:25 GMT+09:00 Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Thierry Reding <thierry.red...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> From: Thierry Reding <tred...@nvidia.com>
>>
>> When registering a GPIO chip, drivers can override the device tree node
>> associated with the chip by setting the chip's ->of_node field. If set,
>> this field is supposed to take precedence over the ->parent->of_node
>> field, but the code doesn't actually do that.
>>
>> Commit 762c2e46c059 ("gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and
>> struct gg_data") exposes this because it now no longer matches on the
>> GPIO chip's ->of_node field, but the GPIO device's ->of_node field that
>> is set using the procedure described above.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <tred...@nvidia.com>
>
> Thanks for catching this, patch applied with Alexandre's ACK.
>
> Masahiro: does this look all right to you?
Yes.
Now, the code matches to the comment. Nice!
Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>
Question:
When we reference the node of gpiochip,
we should use
chip->gpiodev->dev->of_node
instead of
chip->of_node
because we can make chip->of_node optional
as long as chip->parent is set in the probe method.
Correct?
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
