On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 08:55:45PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > The current TWL6030 code for the TWL PWM driver does not reliably disable the > PWM output, as tested with LEDs. The previous commit to that driver introduced > that regression. > > However, it does make sense to disable the PWM clock after resetting the PWM, > but for some obscure reason, doing it all at once simply doesn't work. > > The TWL6030 datasheet mentions that PWMs have to be disabled in two distinct > steps. However, clearing the clock enable bit in a second step (after issuing > a > reset first) does not work. > > The only approach that works is the one that was in place before the previous > commit to the driver. It consists in enabling the PWM clock after issuing a > reset. This is what TI kernel trees and production code seem to be using. > > However, adding an extra step to disable the PWM clock seems to work reliably, > despite looking quite odd. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/pwm/pwm-twl.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
Axel, Peter,
can you guys comment on this?
Thierry
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-twl.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-twl.c
> index 04f7672..7a993b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-twl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-twl.c
> @@ -269,6 +269,22 @@ static void twl6030_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> struct pwm_device *pwm)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + val |= TWL6030_PWM_TOGGLE(pwm->hwpwm, TWL6030_PWMXEN);
> +
> + ret = twl_i2c_write_u8(TWL6030_MODULE_ID1, val, TWL6030_TOGGLE3_REG);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "%s: Failed to disable PWM\n", pwm->label);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + val &= ~TWL6030_PWM_TOGGLE(pwm->hwpwm, TWL6030_PWMXEN);
> +
> + ret = twl_i2c_write_u8(TWL6030_MODULE_ID1, val, TWL6030_TOGGLE3_REG);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "%s: Failed to disable PWM\n", pwm->label);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> twl->twl6030_toggle3 = val;
> out:
> mutex_unlock(&twl->mutex);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
