4.1.27-rt31-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]> at91_pm_init() doesn't return a value, as is the case for its callers, simply call it instead of returning its non-existent return value. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]> Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> --- arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c index 5062699cbb12..460181caf51e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c @@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ void __init at91sam9260_pm_init(void) at91_dt_ramc(); at91_pm_data.memctrl = AT91_MEMCTRL_SDRAMC; at91_pm_data.uhp_udp_mask = AT91SAM926x_PMC_UHP | AT91SAM926x_PMC_UDP; - return at91_pm_init(); + at91_pm_init(); } void __init at91sam9g45_pm_init(void) @@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ void __init at91sam9g45_pm_init(void) at91_dt_ramc(); at91_pm_data.uhp_udp_mask = AT91SAM926x_PMC_UHP; at91_pm_data.memctrl = AT91_MEMCTRL_DDRSDR; - return at91_pm_init(); + at91_pm_init(); } void __init at91sam9x5_pm_init(void) @@ -443,5 +443,5 @@ void __init at91sam9x5_pm_init(void) at91_dt_ramc(); at91_pm_data.uhp_udp_mask = AT91SAM926x_PMC_UHP | AT91SAM926x_PMC_UDP; at91_pm_data.memctrl = AT91_MEMCTRL_DDRSDR; - return at91_pm_init(); + at91_pm_init(); } -- 2.8.1
