3.10.102-rt113-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de>
If we get out of preempt_schedule_irq() then we check for NEED_RESCHED
and call the former function again if set because the preemption counter
has be zero at this point.
However the counter for lazy-preempt might not be zero therefore we have
to check the counter before looking at the need_resched_lazy flag.
Cc: stable...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
---
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
index 9b51e3faff52..06be94212de9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
@@ -234,7 +234,11 @@ svc_preempt:
bne 1b
tst r0, #_TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY
moveq pc, r8 @ go again
- b 1b
+ ldr r0, [tsk, #TI_PREEMPT_LAZY] @ get preempt lazy count
+ teq r0, #0 @ if preempt lazy count != 0
+ beq 1b
+ mov pc, r8 @ go again
+
#endif
__und_fault:
--
2.8.1
