Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> writes: > On 13/07/2016 15:49, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 03:03:42PM +0200, Nicolai Stange wrote: >> >>> clockevents_config_and_register(levt, >>> + (u32)(((u64)tsc_khz * 1000) / >>> + TSC_DIVISOR), >>> 0xF, ~0UL); >> >> div_u64() perhaps ? > > Or just squash together the two patches and do > > tsc_khz * (1000 / TSC_DIVISOR) > > because with TSC_DIVISOR equal to 2/4/8 there is no error from > reassociating the operation.
Oh great, I didn't see this. Will resend. Thanks, Nicolai
