On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:37:01 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgor...@techsingularity.net> wrote:
> > I don't care strongly enough to cause a respin of half the series, and > > it's not your problem that I waited until the last revision went into > > mmots to review and comment. But if you agreed to a revert, would you > > consider tacking on a revert patch at the end of the series? > > > > In this case, I'm going to ask the other people on the cc for a > tie-breaker. If someone else prefers the old names then I'm happy for > your patch to be applied on top with my ack instead of respinning the > whole series. > > Anyone for a tie breaker? I am aggressively undecided. I guess as it's a bit of a 51/49 situation, the "stay with what people are familiar with" benefit tips the balance toward the legacy names?
