* Alex Hung <alex.h...@canonical.com> wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > I agree with you but it can affect a lot of systems according to > 163ea310b68bdde89b1ac633fbf8c0db290d3f86. > > Do you think we should invert 163ea310 instead?
Reverting 163ea310 sounds like a bad idea, considering how old the commit is.
Ok, I guess we should do your patch after all. What a mess DMI based quirk
gating
is!
Thanks,
Ingo
