On 14-07-16, 10:32, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > it wouldn't really, this silly question was not directly related to the > deadlock we are discussing here but to Viresh's argument that later stages > of suspending/hibernation seem to printk many messages in sync mode. so I > thought that there might be a small benefit in suspending consoles later, > as far as I understand, Viresh has `no_console_suspend' anyway. other
That option is enabled only for testing though :) > than that, I tend to stick to the approach of switching to sync mode from > suspend_console(). I actually need to test it out as well :) -- viresh
