On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 10:10 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 08 February 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 02:46 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > was ufs_fs.h purposefully not exported to userspace or did it just slip > > > through the cracks ? assuming the latter scenario, the attached patch > > > touches up the relationship between ufs_fs.h and its sub headers (like > > > ufs_fs_sb.h) so that we can export it ... the silo bootloader takes > > > advantage of this header for example > > > > are you sure it actually uses anything from this header, and not just > > assumes the magic number to be there?? > > (also.. I kind of would think it reasonable for things with their own > > UFS fs reader to have their own header) > > silo utilizes the structures and the random defines so that it can query UFS > filesystems directly
at which point arguably it should have it's own UFS header. It's not using the UFS header to use as *kernel* interface!! -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/