From: Bjørn Mork <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 19:42:28 +0200
> David Laight <[email protected]> writes: >> From: Bjørn Mork >> Not only that, there certainly used to be manufacturers that used 'locally >> administered' addresses on all their cards (as well as those that used >> unallocated >> address blocks). > > Sure. But is there any reason to care about those addresses? And for that case, this patch we are discussing would be a bug fix. I'm going to apply the "bp[0] & 0x02" patch.
