Do you have a new patch?
> > No, that shuldn't be necessary. If it was, the compiler would optimise > > away the first readl() in > > > > my_local = readl(foo); > > my_local = readl(bar); > > > > which would break stuff. readl() implementations use volatile to prevent > > this. > > Ok, i've moved these into their own function called > sm501_sync_regs() to make it more explicit what it is > being used for. > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
