On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 04:44:04PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Nice improvement but how about doing that with the return value of > stacktrace_ops::address() instead? > > print_context_stack_bp() uses that for example. This behaviour could > be extended.
Yes. I will leave the change in print_context_stack_bp() unchanged back. But frankly speaking, I thought the way to add end_walk improves its readibility. So I am not sure which way is better. Could you any guys give me additional opinions about the way to implement? I will follow it. Thank you, Byungchul
