On Jul 13 2016 or thereabouts, Andrew Duggan wrote: > The size of relative data in F11 is already defined by RMI_F11_REL_BYTES. > Use the define in rmi_f11_rel_pos_report() to be consistent. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Duggan <adug...@synaptics.com> > Reviewed-by: Nick Dyer <n...@shmanahar.org>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com> > --- > This is the same as the v2 version. > > drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f11.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f11.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f11.c > index 3fda75b..cce82a1 100644 > --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f11.c > +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f11.c > @@ -530,8 +530,8 @@ static void rmi_f11_rel_pos_report(struct f11_data *f11, > u8 n_finger) > struct f11_2d_data *data = &f11->data; > s8 x, y; > > - x = data->rel_pos[n_finger * 2]; > - y = data->rel_pos[n_finger * 2 + 1]; > + x = data->rel_pos[n_finger * RMI_F11_REL_BYTES]; > + y = data->rel_pos[n_finger * RMI_F11_REL_BYTES + 1]; > > rmi_2d_sensor_rel_report(sensor, x, y); > } > -- > 2.5.0 >
