On 21/07/2016 00:25, Bandan Das wrote:
> That parameter isn't used in the function,
> it's probably a historical artifact.
Same for spte_clear_dirty and spte_set_dirty, please.
Paolo
> Signed-off-by: Bandan Das <b...@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index def97b3..aaecd10 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ static void drop_large_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64
> *sptep)
> *
> * Return true if tlb need be flushed.
> */
> -static bool spte_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep, bool pt_protect)
> +static bool spte_write_protect(u64 *sptep, bool pt_protect)
> {
> u64 spte = *sptep;
>
> @@ -1230,7 +1230,7 @@ static bool __rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
> bool flush = false;
>
> for_each_rmap_spte(rmap_head, &iter, sptep)
> - flush |= spte_write_protect(kvm, sptep, pt_protect);
> + flush |= spte_write_protect(sptep, pt_protect);
>
> return flush;
> }
>
