On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 01:30:41PM -0700, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Okay, but in that case shouldn't we do something like this:
>
> unsigned int cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> unsigned int target_freq)
> {
> target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max);
> policy->cached_target_freq = target_freq;
>
> if (cpufreq_driver->target_index) {
> policy->cached_resolved_idx =
> cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy,
> target_freq,
>
> CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
> return
> policy->freq_table[policy->cached_resolved_idx].frequency;
> }
>
> if (cpufreq_driver->resolve_freq)
> return cpufreq_driver->resolve_freq(policy, target_freq);
> }
Thanks for the review.
My thinking (noted in the commit text) was that the caller of
cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() would verify that the driver supported the
proper calls before using this API. This way it can be checked once,
presumably in a governor's init routine. Checking the pointer over and
over again in a fast path is wasteful.
