From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 21:45:26 +0200

The mempool_destroy() function tests whether its argument is NULL
and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the calls is not needed.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
---
 block/bio-integrity.c | 7 ++-----
 block/bio.c           | 8 ++------
 block/blk-core.c      | 3 +--
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bio-integrity.c b/block/bio-integrity.c
index f70cc3b..7506a3e 100644
--- a/block/bio-integrity.c
+++ b/block/bio-integrity.c
@@ -499,11 +499,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bioset_integrity_create);
 
 void bioset_integrity_free(struct bio_set *bs)
 {
-       if (bs->bio_integrity_pool)
-               mempool_destroy(bs->bio_integrity_pool);
-
-       if (bs->bvec_integrity_pool)
-               mempool_destroy(bs->bvec_integrity_pool);
+       mempool_destroy(bs->bio_integrity_pool);
+       mempool_destroy(bs->bvec_integrity_pool);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(bioset_integrity_free);
 
diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
index 54ee384..21a2222 100644
--- a/block/bio.c
+++ b/block/bio.c
@@ -1843,12 +1843,8 @@ void bioset_free(struct bio_set *bs)
        if (bs->rescue_workqueue)
                destroy_workqueue(bs->rescue_workqueue);
 
-       if (bs->bio_pool)
-               mempool_destroy(bs->bio_pool);
-
-       if (bs->bvec_pool)
-               mempool_destroy(bs->bvec_pool);
-
+       mempool_destroy(bs->bio_pool);
+       mempool_destroy(bs->bvec_pool);
        bioset_integrity_free(bs);
        bio_put_slab(bs);
 
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index a687e9c..db8c6b4 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -636,8 +636,7 @@ int blk_init_rl(struct request_list *rl, struct 
request_queue *q,
 
 void blk_exit_rl(struct request_list *rl)
 {
-       if (rl->rq_pool)
-               mempool_destroy(rl->rq_pool);
+       mempool_destroy(rl->rq_pool);
 }
 
 struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue(gfp_t gfp_mask)
-- 
2.9.2

Reply via email to