On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 06:34:31 +0000 Al Viro wrote: > My current version: > > >From 97f115834b5ebef4f04e0f18aaa10f78f43733a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 23:41:09 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH] sort the devres mess out > > Split the implementation-agnostic stuff in separate files. > Make sure that targets using non-default request_irq() pull > kernel/irq/devres.o > Mark targets that have no ioport_map() and friends, protect the ioport-related > Parts of lib/devres.o with corresponding ifdef (BTW, we need it in driver > dependencies in quite a few of cases, so that symbol was needed anyway). > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig > index 1523046..7215152 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig > @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ config MMU > bool > default y > > +config NO_IOPORT > + bool > + default n
Uh, I think that we would rather see a positive-sense symbol instead of a negative one. Any reason that this one prefers to be negative? Thanks, --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
