I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/ata/sata_sil.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_sil.c b/drivers/ata/sata_sil.c
index 29bcff0..5e35bfb 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_sil.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_sil.c
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, sil_pci_tbl);
 MODULE_VERSION(DRV_VERSION);
 
 static int slow_down;
-module_param(slow_down, int, 0444);
+module_param(slow_down, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(slow_down, "Sledgehammer used to work around random problems, 
by limiting commands to 15 sectors (0=off, 1=on)");
 
 
-- 
2.9.2

Reply via email to