I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com>
---
drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
index 0fbd7c0..9309ec1 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
@@ -1188,17 +1188,17 @@ module_exit(serial8250_exit);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Generic 8250/16x50 serial driver");
-module_param(share_irqs, uint, 0644);
+module_param(share_irqs, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(share_irqs, "Share IRQs with other non-8250/16x50 devices
(unsafe)");
-module_param(nr_uarts, uint, 0644);
+module_param(nr_uarts, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(nr_uarts, "Maximum number of UARTs supported. (1-"
__MODULE_STRING(CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_NR_UARTS) ")");
-module_param(skip_txen_test, uint, 0644);
+module_param(skip_txen_test, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(skip_txen_test, "Skip checking for the TXEN bug at init
time");
#ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_RSA
-module_param_array(probe_rsa, ulong, &probe_rsa_count, 0444);
+module_param_array(probe_rsa, ulong, &probe_rsa_count, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP |
S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(probe_rsa, "Probe I/O ports for RSA");
#endif
MODULE_ALIAS_CHARDEV_MAJOR(TTY_MAJOR);
--
2.9.2
