I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com>
---
sound/pci/aw2/aw2-alsa.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/pci/aw2/aw2-alsa.c b/sound/pci/aw2/aw2-alsa.c
index 1677143..0a59f483 100644
--- a/sound/pci/aw2/aw2-alsa.c
+++ b/sound/pci/aw2/aw2-alsa.c
@@ -153,11 +153,11 @@ static int index[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_IDX;
static char *id[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_STR;
static bool enable[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_ENABLE_PNP;
-module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "Index value for Audiowerk2 soundcard.");
-module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string for the Audiowerk2 soundcard.");
-module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Enable Audiowerk2 soundcard.");
static const struct pci_device_id snd_aw2_ids[] = {
--
2.9.2
