On 02/08/16 07:28, Steve Muckle wrote: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:38:17AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote: > > > > Anyway one way that my patch differed was that I had used the flags > > > > field to keep the behavior the same for both RT and DL. > > > > Do you mean "go to max" policy for both, until proper policies will be > > implemented in the future? > > Yep. >
OK, thanks for clarifying. > > > That happens > > > > later on in this series for RT but the DL policy is modified as above. > > > > Can the DL policy be left as-is and discussed/modified in a separate > > > > series? > > > > Not that we want to start discussing this point now, if we postpone the > > change for later, but I just wanted to point out a difference w.r.t. > > what the schedfreq thing was doing: it used to sum contributions from > > the different classes, instead of taking the max. We probably never > > really discussed on the list what is the right thing to do, though. > > Yeah I figured that was worth deferring into its own patchset/thread. > Right. Makes sense to me to defer this point. Best, - Juri
