I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com> --- drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c index ac4fecb..1b8f9bb 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c @@ -60,12 +60,12 @@ MODULE_DESCRIPTION(DEVICE_FULL_DRV_NAM); #define RX_DESC_DEF0 64 static int vnt_rx_buffers = RX_DESC_DEF0; -module_param_named(rx_buffers, vnt_rx_buffers, int, 0644); +module_param_named(rx_buffers, vnt_rx_buffers, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(rx_buffers, "Number of receive usb rx buffers"); #define TX_DESC_DEF0 64 static int vnt_tx_buffers = TX_DESC_DEF0; -module_param_named(tx_buffers, vnt_tx_buffers, int, 0644); +module_param_named(tx_buffers, vnt_tx_buffers, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(tx_buffers, "Number of receive usb tx buffers"); #define RTS_THRESH_DEF 2347 -- 2.9.2
