I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c b/drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c
index d3a64ba..0a3ca91 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c
@@ -1435,6 +1435,6 @@ module_exit(ppc4xx_edac_exit);
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Grant Erickson <[email protected]>");
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("EDAC MC Driver for the PPC4xx IBM DDR2 Memory Controller");
-module_param(edac_op_state, int, 0444);
+module_param(edac_op_state, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(edac_op_state, "EDAC Error Reporting State: "
                 "0=" EDAC_OPSTATE_POLL_STR ", 2=" EDAC_OPSTATE_INT_STR);
-- 
2.9.2

Reply via email to