I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]> --- drivers/media/radio/radio-trust.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/radio/radio-trust.c b/drivers/media/radio/radio-trust.c index 26a8c60..0c17ffe 100644 --- a/drivers/media/radio/radio-trust.c +++ b/drivers/media/radio/radio-trust.c @@ -43,9 +43,9 @@ static int io[TRUST_MAX] = { [0] = CONFIG_RADIO_TRUST_PORT, [1 ... (TRUST_MAX - 1)] = -1 }; static int radio_nr[TRUST_MAX] = { [0 ... (TRUST_MAX - 1)] = -1 }; -module_param_array(io, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(io, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(io, "I/O addresses of the Trust FM Radio card (0x350 or 0x358)"); -module_param_array(radio_nr, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(radio_nr, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(radio_nr, "Radio device numbers"); struct trust { -- 2.9.2
