On Tue 02-08-16 15:02:44, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 03:29:48PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Apparently if that is the requirement USB will have to define its own > > set of flags to use in such contexts. But still the calls as currently > > executed work. Taking away WQ_MEM_RECLAIM would create danger of > > introducing a regression. The issue with __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM already > > exists and can be fixed. > > Alright, let's go with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM then.
Agreed, I would just add /* * TODO: make sure that no work item in the rescuer can block on an * allocation (so no __GF_DIRECT_RECLAIM) */ to all work item functions. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
