On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Nadav Amit <nadav.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Rafael Aquini <aqu...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> While backporting 71b3c126e611 ("x86/mm: Add barriers and document
>> switch_mm()-vs-flush synchronization")
>> we stumbled across a possibly missing barrier at flush_tlb_page().
>
> I too noticed it and submitted a similar patch that never got a response [1].
>
> Regards,
> Nadav
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/15/598
>
Yeah, sorry, I've been busy. I'll try to get to this soon.
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
