On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Sebastian Frias wrote:
> On 08/04/2016 12:05 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> (for what is worth, my patch was based on a recent 4.7 that does not has the
> code you mention above)

In future, please always check against mainline or the head of the relevant
maintainer tree.
 
> > So we better remove the masking in the xlate functions completely and let 
> > all
> > the offending device trees trip over the warning so they get eventually 
> > fixed.
> 
> That's fine by me.
> If you want I can submit a patch that does what you want (if so, should I use
> "fixes" or not?), let me know.

If it is broken then it wants a fixes tag plus an explanation WHY it is
broken, what consequences the breakage has etc.

If it's just a regular code improvement then not.

Decide yourself.

Thanks,

        tglx


Reply via email to