When printing call return addresses found on a stack, /proc/<pid>/stack
can sometimes give a confusing result.  If the call instruction was the
last instruction in the function (which can happen when calling a
noreturn function), '%pS' will incorrectly display the name of the
function which happens to be next in the object code, rather than the
name of the actual calling function.

Use '%pB' instead, which was created for this exact purpose.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com>
---
 fs/proc/base.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 31370da..cc4d81c 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ static int proc_pid_stack(struct seq_file *m, struct 
pid_namespace *ns,
                save_stack_trace_tsk(task, &trace);
 
                for (i = 0; i < trace.nr_entries; i++) {
-                       seq_printf(m, "[<%pK>] %pS\n",
+                       seq_printf(m, "[<%pK>] %pB\n",
                                   (void *)entries[i], (void *)entries[i]);
                }
                unlock_trace(task);
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to