On Mon 2016-07-18 23:27:49, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> The user space API is achieved via two synchronous IOCTL.
IOCTLs?
> Simplified one, RPMB_IOC_REQ_CMD, were read result cycles is performed
> by the framework on behalf the user and second, RPMB_IOC_SEQ_CMD where
> the whole RPMB sequence including RESULT_READ is supplied by the caller.
> The latter is intended for easier adjusting of the applications that
> use MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD ioctl.
Why " "?
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.wink...@intel.com>
> +
> +static long rpmb_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + return __rpmb_ioctl(fp, cmd, (void __user *)arg);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> +static long rpmb_compat_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd,
> + unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + return __rpmb_ioctl(fp, cmd, compat_ptr(arg));
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
Description of the ioctl is missing, and it should certainly be
designed in a way that it does not need compat support.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
