On Tuesday 12 July 2016 12:41 AM, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote: > From: "Cooper Jr., Franklin" <fcoo...@ti.com> > > For some devices, the PWMSS is a parent of eCAP and ePWM and provided the
"and provides .." > functional clocks for those submodules. The ti,am33xx-ecap and > ti,am33xx-ehrpwm were based on this parent child relationship where the "ti,am33xx-ehrpwm bindings were .." > functional clock would be grabbed from the module's parent. > > However, DA850 doesn't have a PWMSS and the eCAP and ePWM provides their > functional clock themselves. Therefore, prefer the new binding that doesn't > assume this parent child relationship. > > Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcoo...@ti.com> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> Queuing this for v4.9 with above minor commit message fixes made locally. Regards, Sekhar
