> > This is all scary and generally not needed spew but handy for debug. > > > > Looks like a PCMCIA layer bug. It should be respecting IRQ assignment > > (not just allocation) by other resource configuration layers. > > Ah thanks for taking a look. I was slowly getting the impression from older > lkml posts, that this isn't really what stopped my wifi from functioning. It > seems there are other reasons and i just stumbled across this harmless > message in dmesg.. Thanks for clearing it up :)
The problem is we don't know what the PNP layer does about the routing here. It could be breaking the wifi but it's only a possible cause. It still shouldn't be using IRQ 4 after pnp had it. I'm also a little suprised to see both pnp and ACPI triggering. I thought it wasn't permitted to use both at once but that really wants asking of an ACPI guru like Len. Does it work if you compile out PNP bios support ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/