On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 03:46:32PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
...
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 850737bdfbd8..22b2c1f3db0e 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -3629,11 +3629,15 @@ static void list_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s, 
> struct page *page,
>   */
>  static void free_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n)
>  {
> +     LIST_HEAD(partial_list);
>       struct page *page, *h;
>  
>       BUG_ON(irqs_disabled());
>       spin_lock_irq(&n->list_lock);
> -     list_for_each_entry_safe(page, h, &n->partial, lru) {
> +     list_splice_init(&n->partial, &partial_list);
> +     spin_unlock_irq(&n->list_lock);
> +
> +     list_for_each_entry_safe(page, h, &partial_list, lru) {
>               if (!page->inuse) {
>                       remove_partial(n, page);

remove_partial() must be called with n->list_lock held - it even has
lockdep_assert_held(). What you actually need to do is to move
discard_slab() out of the critical section, like __kmem_cache_shrink()
does.

>                       discard_slab(s, page);
> @@ -3642,7 +3646,6 @@ static void free_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct 
> kmem_cache_node *n)
>                       "Objects remaining in %s on __kmem_cache_shutdown()");
>               }
>       }
> -     spin_unlock_irq(&n->list_lock);
>  }
>  
>  /*

Reply via email to