On Thu 04 Aug 02:21 PDT 2016, Lee Jones wrote:

> These types of error prints are superfluous.  The system will
> pick up on OOM issues and let the user know.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>

Although, I think we should drop the "mapping" object. We have all the
information in the carveout object to reverse the mapping at cleanup.

Regards,
Bjorn

> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c 
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 5654a81..4914482 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -619,7 +619,6 @@ static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
>       if (rproc->domain) {
>               mapping = kzalloc(sizeof(*mapping), GFP_KERNEL);
>               if (!mapping) {
> -                     dev_err(dev, "kzalloc mapping failed\n");
>                       ret = -ENOMEM;
>                       goto dma_free;
>               }
> -- 
> 2.9.0
> 

Reply via email to