On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 14:44:26 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 06:44:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 04:33:34PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm resending Sebastian's sysv msg queue use of wake_qs but updated > > > to the last observations I need wrt the need of explicit barriers > > > after removing the whole receiver busy-looping. After some irc exchange > > > it seems we're both on the same page, and things now look like he had > > > them earlier, in v2. This is all patch 1. > > > > > > The rest of the patches are changes I noticed while reviewing patch 1, > > > which are mainly sender-side rework/optimizations. Details are in each > > > changelog. > > > > > > The changes have survived ltp (which has some nasty corner cases for > > > msgsnd > > > changes), as well as pmsg-shared benchmark. > > > > Not really my area, but over all the patches look good. > > > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Thanks. > Andrew, will you pick these up, or should I route then through > tip/locking or something? I'll be processing these later today/tomorrow.
