On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 05:23:36PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:12:30PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL
> PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > Generic event handling mechanism.
> >
> > Kevent is a generic subsytem which allows to handle event notifications.
> > It supports both level and edge triggered events. It is similar to
> > poll/epoll in some cases, but it is more scalable, it is faster and
> > allows to work with essentially eny kind of events.
> >
> > Events are provided into kernel through control syscall and can be read
> > back through ring buffer or using usual syscalls.
> > Kevent update (i.e. readiness switching) happens directly from internals
> > of the appropriate state machine of the underlying subsytem (like
> > network, filesystem, timer or any other).
> >
> > Homepage:
> > http://tservice.net.ru/~s0mbre/old/?section=projects&item=kevent
> >
> > Documentation page:
> > http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/Kevent
> >
> > Consider for inclusion.
> >
> > P.S. If you want to be removed from Cc: list just drop me a mail.
> >
> > Changes from 'take34' patchset:
> > * Ported to the 2.6.20-rc7 (9be5b038b1c9d1927c367bf91683458e10d5d4eb) tree.
>
> Is there some progress?
> Some things to be implemented, described or discussed?
I think that mean that everybody is happy with APi, design and set of
features.
Andrew, do you consider kevent for inclusion or declining?
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
