On 11/08/16 09:37, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 08/08/16 22:48, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 1:45 AM, John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>> @@ -614,7 +615,11 @@ unsigned int irq_create_fwspec_mapping(struct
>>> irq_fwspec *fwspec)
>>> * it now and return the interrupt number.
>>> */
>>> if (irq_get_trigger_type(virq) == IRQ_TYPE_NONE) {
>>> - irq_set_irq_type(virq, type);
>>> + irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(virq);
>>> + if (!irq_data)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + irqd_set_trigger_type(irq_data, type);
>>> return virq;
>>> }
>>>
>>> If I revert just that, it works again.
>>
>> This makes my platform work too.
>> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
>
> Hmmm. I'm now booting your kernel on the APQ8060, and reverting this
> hunk doesn't fix it for me. I'm confused...
>
> The interesting part is this:
> 109: 100000 0 msmgpio 88 Level (null)
88 is the pm8058 parent interrupt and so I am surprised you would even
see this in /proc/interrupts as it should be a chained interrupt, right?
Are you seeing this with all the ethernet updates for the APQ8060 in
Linus' branch? I am curious what you see with stock v4.8-rc1 and if
interrupts work ok with the change I had proposed. Hard to tell if there
is more than one issue here.
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
