On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 08:51:38AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:50:57AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > Michael reported 'perf mem -t store record' being broken.
> > The reason is latest rework of this area:
> > commit acbe613e0c03 ("perf tools: Add monitored events array")
> >
> > We don't mark perf_mem_events store record when -t store
> > option is specified.
> >
> > Fixes: commit acbe613e0c03 ("perf tools: Add monitored events array")
> ^^^^^^
> I'll remove this extraneous bit
well, checkpatch script complained about that when
I did not put it there.. but I don't mind ;-)
jirka
>
> > Reported-by: Michael Petlan <mpet...@redhat.com>
> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-dbytnk7urdnnaw7ckdu1w...@git.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/builtin-mem.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
> > index d608a2c9e48c..d1ce29be560e 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
> > @@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ static int __cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv,
> > struct perf_mem *mem)
> > if (mem->operation & MEM_OPERATION_LOAD)
> > perf_mem_events[PERF_MEM_EVENTS__LOAD].record = true;
> >
> > + if (mem->operation & MEM_OPERATION_STORE)
> > + perf_mem_events[PERF_MEM_EVENTS__STORE].record = true;
> > +
> > if (perf_mem_events[PERF_MEM_EVENTS__LOAD].record)
> > rec_argv[i++] = "-W";
> >
> > --
> > 2.4.11
