Hi, On Tuesday 13 February 2007 06:47, Pierre Ossman wrote: > Sascha Sommer wrote: > > I still consider this driver experimental, but without documentation this > > is probably not going to change anytime soon. > > The question is now what I should do with the driver? > > Is it worth to be included in the kernel? If yes where and against what > > kernelversion should I send the patch? > > That's up to you. The most important thing for any part of the kernel is > that it must have a maintainer. So if you are ready to keep the driver > up to date and handle the support requests that show, then you should > really submit it. > > Patches should always be sent against the current version of the kernel > (i.e. git HEAD). Usually the latest packaged release will also do. > > (Note that I haven't had time to review your latest version of the driver) >
Yes, I'm going to maintain it. There are still some bugs that need to be fixed first, though. I also got a mail from someone else how also did some reverseengineering work for this reader. I'm waiting for his feedback before I will submit a patch that can be included. Thanks. Sascha - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
