On 2/13/07, Pavel Emelianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have implementation that moves arbitrary task :)
Is that the one that calls stop_machine() in order to move a task around? That seemed a little heavyweight ...
May be we can do context (container-on-task) handling lockless?
What did you have in mind?
> I thought that we solved that problem by having a tmp_bc field in the > task_struct that would take precedence over the main bc if it was > non-null? Of course, but I'm commenting this patchset which doesn't have this facility.
OK, I can add the concept in to the example too. Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
