On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:47:28AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 03:30:29PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:16:33AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > > There doesn't seem to be very many > > > arm systems with PCI, so it's hard to tell. > > > > NetWinder, EBSA285 (which the NetWinder is a derivative of), the N2100, > > etc are PCI based and are all well proven in the field. > > Which PCI controller do they use?
NetWinder and EBSA285 are DC21285 (footbridge). The N2100 is IOP32x based. As for gluing a PCI bridge to something not designed for PCI (eg, a PXA255) I can't comment. > > (I did consider replacing the Promise UDMA card, but the IT821x card > > I bought to replace it didn't have all the pins on the chip soldered > > down - to the extent that even a PC couldn't recognise the PCI card. > > So I'm running on the assumption that the self-repaired Promise UDMA > > card is all round going to be more reliable than the as yet unproven > > IT821x card.) > > And they shipped a card in that state? Indeed. :( -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
