4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Toshi Kani <[email protected]> commit d63dcf49cf5ae5605f4d14229e3888e104f294b1 upstream. Borislav Petkov suggested: > Please use on init paths boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT) and on fast > paths static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT). No more of that cpu_has_XXX > ugliness. Replace the use of cpu_has_pat on init paths with boot_cpu_has(). Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Juergen Gross <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Robert Elliott <[email protected]> Cc: Toshi Kani <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- arch/x86/mm/pat.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static void pat_bsp_init(u64 pat) { u64 tmp_pat; - if (!cpu_has_pat) { + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT)) { pat_disable("PAT not supported by CPU."); return; } @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static void pat_bsp_init(u64 pat) static void pat_ap_init(u64 pat) { - if (!cpu_has_pat) { + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT)) { /* * If this happens we are on a secondary CPU, but switched to * PAT on the boot CPU. We have no way to undo PAT.
