Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author: Igmar Palsenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
>
> > The program does not work. A program works if it does what it's supposed to
> > do. If you want to argue that this program is supposed to print "ffffff"
> > then explain to me why the 'malloc' contains a zero in parenthesis.
> >
> > The program can't possibly work because it invokes undefined behavior. It
> > is impossible to determine what a program that invokes undefined behavior is
> > 'supposed to do'.
>
> May I remind you guys that a malloc(0) is equal to a free(). There is no
> way that any mem get's malloced.
>
Where the heck did you get idea?
-hpa
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
