Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Zachary Amsden wrote:
This turned out really hideous looking to me. Can't we split the
struct into GPL'd and non-GPL'd functions instead? We still have the
same granularity, and none of this function call to an indirect
function call nonsense.
It's not pretty, but I think having paravirt_ops and paravirt_ops_gpl
would be worse. I'd be sympathetic to the idea of splitting
paravirt_ops up by function groupings, but splitting it by license seems
like a maintenance headache with no real upside. Besides, patching will
solve everything (tm).
Ok. As long as we plan on patching CR2 and CR0 / clts accessors for FPU
save during context switch and page fault paths in the future.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
