4.7-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>

commit e85d7ee42003314652ab3ae2c60e3b8cd793b65f upstream.

They are not the same error, and need to be handled differently.

Fixes: 183d9e7b112aa ("pnfs: rework LAYOUTGET retry handling")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c |   23 ++++++++++++++---------
 fs/nfs/pnfs.c     |    1 +
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ static int nfs4_do_handle_exception(stru
                case -NFS4ERR_DELAY:
                        nfs_inc_server_stats(server, NFSIOS_DELAY);
                case -NFS4ERR_GRACE:
+               case -NFS4ERR_LAYOUTTRYLATER:
                case -NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT:
                        exception->delay = 1;
                        return 0;
@@ -7869,11 +7870,12 @@ nfs4_layoutget_handle_exception(struct r
        struct inode *inode = lgp->args.inode;
        struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(inode);
        struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo;
-       int status = task->tk_status;
+       int nfs4err = task->tk_status;
+       int err, status = 0;
 
        dprintk("--> %s tk_status => %d\n", __func__, -task->tk_status);
 
-       switch (status) {
+       switch (nfs4err) {
        case 0:
                goto out;
 
@@ -7905,12 +7907,11 @@ nfs4_layoutget_handle_exception(struct r
                        status = -EOVERFLOW;
                        goto out;
                }
-               /* Fallthrough */
+               status = -EBUSY;
+               break;
        case -NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT:
-               nfs4_handle_exception(server, -NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT,
-                                       exception);
                status = -ERECALLCONFLICT;
-               goto out;
+               break;
        case -NFS4ERR_EXPIRED:
        case -NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID:
                exception->timeout = 0;
@@ -7941,9 +7942,13 @@ nfs4_layoutget_handle_exception(struct r
                        spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
        }
 
-       status = nfs4_handle_exception(server, status, exception);
-       if (exception->retry)
-               status = -EAGAIN;
+       err = nfs4_handle_exception(server, nfs4err, exception);
+       if (!status) {
+               if (exception->retry)
+                       status = -EAGAIN;
+               else
+                       status = err;
+       }
 out:
        dprintk("<-- %s\n", __func__);
        return status;
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -1647,6 +1647,7 @@ lookup_again:
                                 PNFS_UPDATE_LAYOUT_SEND_LAYOUTGET);
        if (IS_ERR(lseg)) {
                switch(PTR_ERR(lseg)) {
+               case -EBUSY:
                case -ERECALLCONFLICT:
                        if (time_after(jiffies, giveup))
                                lseg = NULL;


Reply via email to