Gautham, I'll try to apply this patch and read the code on Sunday, right
now a couple of comments about workqueue.c changes.

On 02/14, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
>
> --- hotplug.orig/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ hotplug/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -368,6 +368,7 @@ static int worker_thread(void *__cwq)
>       DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
>       struct k_sigaction sa;
>       sigset_t blocked;
> +     int bind_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  
>       if (!cwq->wq->freezeable)
>               current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
> @@ -392,8 +393,11 @@ static int worker_thread(void *__cwq)
>       do_sigaction(SIGCHLD, &sa, (struct k_sigaction *)0);
>  
>       for (;;) {
> -             if (cwq->wq->freezeable)
> +             if (cwq->wq->freezeable) {

Else? This is wrong. The change like this should start from making all
cwq->threads freezeable, otherwise it just doesn't work.

>                       try_to_freeze();
> +                     if (cpu_is_offline(bind_cpu))
> +                             goto wait_to_die;
> +             }
>
> ...
>
> +
> +wait_to_die:
> +     /* Wait for kthread_stop */
> +     set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> +     while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> +             schedule();
> +             set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> +     }
> +     __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> +     return 0;
>  }

I believe this is not needed, see the comments for the next patch.

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to