On 17/08/16 13:13, Vignesh R wrote:
> It is possible that two or more ADC channels can be simultaneously
> requested for raw samples, in which case there can be race in access to
> FIFO data resulting in loss of samples.
> If am335x_tsc_se_set_once() is called again from tiadc_read_raw(), when
> ADC is still acquired to sample one of the channels, the second process
> might be put into uninterruptible sleep state. Fix these issues, by
> protecting FIFO access and channel configurations with a mutex. Since
> tiadc_read_raw() might take anywhere between few microseconds to few
> milliseconds to finish execution (depending on averaging and delay
> values supplied via DT), its better to use mutex instead of spinlock.
> 
> Fixes: 7ca6740cd1cd4 ("mfd: input: iio: ti_amm335x: Rework TSC/ADC 
> synchronization")
> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <[email protected]>
Thanks for tracking this down and for the patch in the
first place!

Applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git and marked for
stable.  Should head upstream sometime this week.

Jonathan
> ---
> 
> v2: Add fixes tag.
> 
>  drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
> index 8a368756881b..bed9977a1863 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>  
>  struct tiadc_device {
>       struct ti_tscadc_dev *mfd_tscadc;
> +     struct mutex fifo1_lock; /* to protect fifo access */
>       int channels;
>       u8 channel_line[8];
>       u8 channel_step[8];
> @@ -359,6 +360,7 @@ static int tiadc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>               int *val, int *val2, long mask)
>  {
>       struct tiadc_device *adc_dev = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +     int ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
>       int i, map_val;
>       unsigned int fifo1count, read, stepid;
>       bool found = false;
> @@ -372,6 +374,7 @@ static int tiadc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>       if (!step_en)
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
> +     mutex_lock(&adc_dev->fifo1_lock);
>       fifo1count = tiadc_readl(adc_dev, REG_FIFO1CNT);
>       while (fifo1count--)
>               tiadc_readl(adc_dev, REG_FIFO1);
> @@ -388,7 +391,8 @@ static int tiadc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  
>               if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
>                       am335x_tsc_se_adc_done(adc_dev->mfd_tscadc);
> -                     return -EAGAIN;
> +                     ret = -EAGAIN;
> +                     goto err_unlock;
>               }
>       }
>       map_val = adc_dev->channel_step[chan->scan_index];
> @@ -414,8 +418,11 @@ static int tiadc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>       am335x_tsc_se_adc_done(adc_dev->mfd_tscadc);
>  
>       if (found == false)
> -             return -EBUSY;
> -     return IIO_VAL_INT;
> +             ret =  -EBUSY;
> +
> +err_unlock:
> +     mutex_unlock(&adc_dev->fifo1_lock);
> +     return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static const struct iio_info tiadc_info = {
> @@ -483,6 +490,7 @@ static int tiadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>       tiadc_step_config(indio_dev);
>       tiadc_writel(adc_dev, REG_FIFO1THR, FIFO1_THRESHOLD);
> +     mutex_init(&adc_dev->fifo1_lock);
>  
>       err = tiadc_channel_init(indio_dev, adc_dev->channels);
>       if (err < 0)
> 

Reply via email to