On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Patch looks generally ok. Some of the whitespace/formatting changes are
> questionable, I usually leave that up to the maintainer unless it is
> very gratuitously opposite to CodingStyle.
>
These drivers seem to be unmantained :)
Anyway if this is a problem I can undo these changes ...
> Some of the driver messages ("foo version 1.0") are purposefully printed
> -after-, not before, the device is probed and registered. Your patch
> gets this wrong in at least one place.
>
Yes... I wasn't sure about this... can undo...
> Finally, a word to you, Alan, and others doing request_region work: it
> is more informative to pass the device name (minor, etc.) into
> request_region. Ditto for request_irq. Many (most, except net?)
> drivers use board/chip name instead of registered interface name. If
> you can use the interface name for request_region or request_irq, use
> it... it allows differentiation between multiple boards of the same
> type. That's especially when looking at ISA regions in /proc/ioports,
> or interrupt counts in /proc/interrupts.
>
> Jeff
Agree... but in this case it's less important until radio drivers
supports multiple boards...
thanks
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
