On Thursday 15 February 2007 03:54, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:34:23AM +0100, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
wrote:
> > Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c
> > +++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c
> > @@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys32_ptrace(long reques
> > case PTRACE_SINGLESTEP:
> > case PTRACE_DETACH:
> > case PTRACE_SYSCALL:
> > + case PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS:
> > case PTRACE_SETOPTIONS:
> > case PTRACE_SET_THREAD_AREA:
> > case PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA:
>
> I sent an equivalent patch in earlier today:
Doh! Interesting this timing...
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c
> @@ -239,6 +239,8 @@ asmlinkage long sys32_ptrace(long reques
> __u32 val;
>
> switch (request) {
> + case PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS:
> + request = PTRACE_SETOPTIONS;
> case PTRACE_TRACEME:
> case PTRACE_ATTACH:
> case PTRACE_KILL:
>
> I change the request so that PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS doesn't need to
> propogate any further. However, it is present in include/asm-x86_64,
> so I guess that counts as being part of the x86_64 ABI. That being
> the case, I guess my patch can be dropped in favor of this one.
It is handled in ptrace_request, unless there are include problems. I'm going
to reboot and test mine for any remaining problem.
--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can add them to my list!
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale!
http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
